matlab-based application force review automation environment or frame Search Results


90
MathWorks Inc esophageal aimplot software
Esophageal Aimplot Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/esophageal aimplot software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
esophageal aimplot software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab based software
Matlab Based Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab based software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab based software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc advanced normalization tools (ants) software package
Advanced Normalization Tools (Ants) Software Package, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/advanced normalization tools (ants) software package/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
advanced normalization tools (ants) software package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab-based automated spike-sorting software kilosort61
Matlab Based Automated Spike Sorting Software Kilosort61, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab-based automated spike-sorting software kilosort61/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab-based automated spike-sorting software kilosort61 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab-based script
Matlab Based Script, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab-based script/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab-based script - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc automated matlab based windows application
Automated Matlab Based Windows Application, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/automated matlab based windows application/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
automated matlab based windows application - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc semi-automated matlab-based software
Semi Automated Matlab Based Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/semi-automated matlab-based software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
semi-automated matlab-based software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab-based automated netquant application
Comparison of NET quantification by hand counting semi-automated quantification and <t>NETQUANT.</t> A : Cell numbers for Image set 1 determined by all three methods, showing significantly fewer cell counts by NETQUANT in the majority of the images. B : NET formation determined by all methods revealed a significant difference between hand counting and NETQUANT as well as the semi-automated method. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi-automated and NETQUANT values were compared with hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Matlab Based Automated Netquant Application, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab-based automated netquant application/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab-based automated netquant application - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc cellprofiler
Comparison of NET quantification by hand counting semi-automated quantification and <t>NETQUANT.</t> A : Cell numbers for Image set 1 determined by all three methods, showing significantly fewer cell counts by NETQUANT in the majority of the images. B : NET formation determined by all methods revealed a significant difference between hand counting and NETQUANT as well as the semi-automated method. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi-automated and NETQUANT values were compared with hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Cellprofiler, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cellprofiler/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cellprofiler - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc automated procedure based on cluster analysis matlab r2013a
Comparison of NET quantification by hand counting semi-automated quantification and <t>NETQUANT.</t> A : Cell numbers for Image set 1 determined by all three methods, showing significantly fewer cell counts by NETQUANT in the majority of the images. B : NET formation determined by all methods revealed a significant difference between hand counting and NETQUANT as well as the semi-automated method. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi-automated and NETQUANT values were compared with hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Automated Procedure Based On Cluster Analysis Matlab R2013a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/automated procedure based on cluster analysis matlab r2013a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
automated procedure based on cluster analysis matlab r2013a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab-based sleep-scoring software
Comparison of NET quantification by hand counting semi-automated quantification and <t>NETQUANT.</t> A : Cell numbers for Image set 1 determined by all three methods, showing significantly fewer cell counts by NETQUANT in the majority of the images. B : NET formation determined by all methods revealed a significant difference between hand counting and NETQUANT as well as the semi-automated method. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi-automated and NETQUANT values were compared with hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Matlab Based Sleep Scoring Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab-based sleep-scoring software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab-based sleep-scoring software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparison of NET quantification by hand counting semi-automated quantification and NETQUANT. A : Cell numbers for Image set 1 determined by all three methods, showing significantly fewer cell counts by NETQUANT in the majority of the images. B : NET formation determined by all methods revealed a significant difference between hand counting and NETQUANT as well as the semi-automated method. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi-automated and NETQUANT values were compared with hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Journal: Heliyon

Article Title: Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations

doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16982

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of NET quantification by hand counting semi-automated quantification and NETQUANT. A : Cell numbers for Image set 1 determined by all three methods, showing significantly fewer cell counts by NETQUANT in the majority of the images. B : NET formation determined by all methods revealed a significant difference between hand counting and NETQUANT as well as the semi-automated method. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi-automated and NETQUANT values were compared with hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to compare the evaluation of two sets of immunofluorescence images using three different approaches: (1) hand counting, (2) semi-automated quantification [ ], and (3) the MATLAB-based automated NETQUANT application [ ].

Techniques: Comparison

Comparison of hand counting, NETQUANT, and semi-automated quantification for image set 2. A shows the cell count for the control group with the semi-automated methods giving unrealistically high values for some images. Significant differences by both semi-automated and NETQUANT compared to hand counting were apparent. In B, the pattern remained similar to A, where the semi-automated method showed remarkably higher values of cell counts in several cases. C depicts NET formation values by all three methods, with the semi-automated method showing significantly higher results than both other methods in the control group, even exceeding 100% NET formation. D shows NET formation of the stimulated group where NETQUANT exhibited values within the range of hand counting, while the semi -automated method revealed significant differences. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi -automated and NETQUANT values were compared to hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Journal: Heliyon

Article Title: Comparison of NET quantification methods based on immunofluorescence microscopy: Hand-counting, semi-automated and automated evaluations

doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16982

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of hand counting, NETQUANT, and semi-automated quantification for image set 2. A shows the cell count for the control group with the semi-automated methods giving unrealistically high values for some images. Significant differences by both semi-automated and NETQUANT compared to hand counting were apparent. In B, the pattern remained similar to A, where the semi-automated method showed remarkably higher values of cell counts in several cases. C depicts NET formation values by all three methods, with the semi-automated method showing significantly higher results than both other methods in the control group, even exceeding 100% NET formation. D shows NET formation of the stimulated group where NETQUANT exhibited values within the range of hand counting, while the semi -automated method revealed significant differences. Statistical analysis was performed by Two-Way ANOVA with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Semi -automated and NETQUANT values were compared to hand counting. Data are given as mean ± SD. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to compare the evaluation of two sets of immunofluorescence images using three different approaches: (1) hand counting, (2) semi-automated quantification [ ], and (3) the MATLAB-based automated NETQUANT application [ ].

Techniques: Comparison, Cell Counting, Control